group 6

1. What is the main message of Group 6's podcast topic?

-capital punishment





2. Did their show provide solutions to the problem? What are they?

-mess media should take responsibilities for this serious problem.



3. Comment on the group's podcast.

3.1 What can you say about the quality of recording?

-it's okay.



3.1.1 Was the voice of the hosts/guests/characters loud and clear?

-some are loud enough, some are unclearly.





3.1.2 Was there any background noise that made it difficult to understand what was being said?

-no, they didn't have any background noise.



3.1.3 Was the pacing (speed) of the delivery (oral delivery made by the hosts/guests/characters) too slow or too fast?

-it was moderate




3.2 Was there any sound effects or background music used? Was it effective? In what way?

-they didn't use background music




3.3 Was there anything that you like about their show? What is it and why?

-no background noise and clear voice



3.4 Was there anything that you didn't like about their show? What is it and why?

-umm, a little boring.




3.5 If Group 6 is given the chance to do another presentation, what would you suggest members of Group 3 to do to make their presentation better?

-you can use some viedo or pictures.





4. What do you think?


4.1 In which situations or crime committed do you think it is OK to use death penalty?

-if they kill people.



4.2 Do you agree that if you kill someone, you have to die, too? Or do you agree that capital punishment is wrong because it is another form of killing?

-yes, because i am deserved. But if I am not on porpose. I think the punishment could be diminish.


-No... I don't agree. Beacuse that how you treat someone, what the results are all you deserve!